Directed by Don Siegel; produced by William Jacobs
Detective Superintendent Grodman (Sydney Greenstreet) returns to Scotland Yard after reluctantly attending the hanging of a man he had arrested for murder. He almost immediately learns that the prisoner was, in fact, innocent, as proven by new evidence. Goodman is sacked, and his hated rival, Buckley (George Coulouris), replaces him. But soon, Buckley is facing criticism over an unsolved homicide, and turns to Grodman for help.
What seems at first to be an intriguing and atmospheric mystery degenerates quickly - once one applies some thought to the components. The story could have devoted more consideration to the the case over which Grodman is fired. After all, as soon as he returns to his office after the hanging, he is confronted by the police commissioner (Holmes Herbert), who berates him over the circumstantial evidence that led to the execution - though surely the commissioner should have intervened before this, if he thought the case faulty. Grodman later - also without much proof - uncovers the original murder’s real perpetrator, though common sense should have led to the killer in the first place.
Further, Buckley’s character is more incompetent than any official detective Conan Doyle devised; Lestrade was at least a workman-like plodder. A good writer would have made such an unsympathetic character as Buckley a better policeman without abdicating his wrong-headedness. Such a stupid man might be found in broad farces, but has no place in more realistic mysteries. And the motive to the crimes in the film would have been almost clever if it hadn’t been polluted by several unnecessary red herrings.
The story was adapted from a novel by Israel Zangwill, an Englishman born in 1864, so he would have been familiar with Victorian Britain as a matter of course. Yet, there is something inauthentic about the setting (London, 1890) that suggests whatever innate atmosphere the original had was diluted by Peter Milne’s screenplay. The depiction of a music hall is entirely a 1940s night-club in earlier garb, and the notion that a police superintendent would live in the same street as a member of Parliament, and belong to the same club, is quite a stretch.
Interestingly, the costumer (Travilla, the man who put Marilyn Monroe in a potato sack) seemed to know more about the era and place than anyone else. The police sergeant Grodman speaks with outside Newgate Prison has the crested helmet of the City of London Police (distinct from the Metropolitan Police (Scotland Yard)), since the prison was in the City. Later, a constable is seen outside Scotland Yard, wearing an i.d. number beginning with ‘A’, the letter of the division that did indeed police the immediate vicinity of the famous headquarters. It’s too bad the film’s scriptwriter didn’t follow Travilla’s example in research.
It is always fun to see Greenstreet and Peter Lorre working in the same movie; I believe they were in nine pictures together. But they don’t have the verve created by a fine script to work from, and neither seems entirely thrilled with his work, though it in fact is good. Mediocre Greenstreet is more entertaining than most other actors’ best.
The Verdict is a movie that has promise in its opening, but quickly loses its potential in its execution. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the movie is that it is the first feature directed by Don Siegel, and quite different from the work for which he is famous.